Just as it’s crucial for the manufacturer to verify the authenticity of an update, it’s equally important that only authorized individuals can approve or reject updates and that they are properly informed on how to safely carry out the update. This is to prevent interference from those who might attempt to install harmful software or hinder the installation of new updates. It’s also vital that the OEM can enforce certain updates to preserve the vehicle system’s integrity and ensure user safety. In such cases, it’s essential that the update is installed as quickly as possible. In some critical situations, the OEM may limit certain vehicle functions or the entire vehicle usage until the updates are installed.
Main Question
Is there a (robust) method for the authorised owner of the vehicle to accept or reject updates?
Sub-Questions
- Does this method consider the fact that the owner is not necessarily the driver of the vehicle?
- For software patches that fix a security vulnerability, is there a method to make the update mandatory and ensure timely installation?
- For mandatory updates is the user still adequately informed of the update and its purpose?