Strongly related to the previous question, the impact of secondary tasks needs to be understood in details, in the validation phase, especially on the TOR provided by the function (Verma & Choudhary, 2018). If the impact is high (i.e. affecting vehicle safety) certain secondary tasks (e.g. mirroring) shall be forbidden (at least from L1 to L3 of automation).
Main Question
Is the impact of typical secondary tasks on take-over time(s) and quality identified?
Sub-Questions
- Is customer clinic or expert assessment data available on this?
- If possible, have simulations been conducted?
References
- Verma, B. and Choudhary, A. (2018) ‘Deep Learning Based Real-Time Driver Emotion Monitoring’, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), pp. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVES.2018.8519595